Homo Sapiens vs. Irish

About 50 years ago I came across a pamphlet written by a lad who called himself Professor Wisdom from Pemberville, Ohio. The title of his pamphlet was HOMO SAPIENS VS IRISH, and his thesis was that the Irish were Neanderthals, "a despicable dirty species," guilty of "noncognitive yet cunning immorality."  Also the Irish had, according to Wisdom, an "instinctive attachment to Jews." There might be something in this last part--I am of Irish descent and had, instinctively and without cognition, married a Jew.

Although Wisdom was certain that the Irish lacked "the faculties of intellect," somehow they had succeeded in electing an ape to be President of the United States. Because JFK was an animal, no bill that he signed actually had the force of law. 

The lack of ability found in Neanderthals had been overcome in part by the "cushioning of Jewish scientists" and the Jews' "commercial exploitationism." Of course some interbreeding among species had already taken place. Remember Abbie's Irish Rose? Needless to say, a recovery from this plague of impurity would be slow. "Genealogical experience has shown that it takes at least eight to ten generations of pure Sapiens breeding to overcome the effects of interspecies mating. . . ." 

You could avoid contact with the Irish by avoiding anyone with a "recessed forehead," but good luck with that, given that about 25,000,000 Neanderthals lived in the United States. On the other hand, in our era, the DNA of the Irish has proved difficult to distinguish from the DNA of Europeans in general, so perhaps the Sapiens should just give up. I say to hell with them.