In the army I took an oath to defend the Constitution. That's fine. I still defend it, although it is a strange old thing.
The Constitution gives us a platform for discussion and governance.
I'm guessing the Constitution took the form it did for many reasons, and one big reason was that men educated at Harvard feared that white working-class men might outvote them in a democracy and grab their money.
So the rich wrote a labyrinthine, difficult constitution designed to keep the rich in power.
Today, though, tech billionaires have allied themselves with working-class white men to pick a king, to destroy the Constitution and to beat down the mildly progressive middle-class.
This alliance of the rich with white workers to destroy the middle class has happened in other countries.
It doesn't make sense for billionaires to attack the system that enriched them. Maybe they get addled by the impact of super-wealth. They surround themselves with fawning yes-men. They begin to think they are wise.
to insure (if possible) that mobs of inferior thinkers could not come to power. The inferiors--women, people of color and ignorant poor white males--were denied the vote. That way no inferior could threaten rich white males.
The basic American political platform mixed some democratic representation with some oligarchy or rule by the Harvard-educated elite. Governors could be elected directly by white men, but Presidents would be elected by a conclave of deep thinkers called "the electoral college," which is not a college.
That political system, patched and sometimes improved, held together until last November when a lot of power was won by the irrational male mob so feared by Benjamin Franklyn. This mob was funded by stupid billionaires. But the mob and the stupid billionaires have incompatible goals.
Who knows what will come next?
I'm just guessing.
w